Archives For June 2007

Note: This summer I have the privilege of conducting an independent study with Dr. Hughes Oliphant Old, professor of reformed liturgics at Erskine Theological Seminary as well as a visiting lecturer at Princeton Theological Seminary. As part of that study, I will be reading a number of books related to our studies of Christian worship. I will attempt to post my summaries of those books as I complete them. Here is the first which happens to be the only full length book by Old on the list.

Themes & Variations for a Christian Doxology by Hughes Oliphant Old

Themes & Variations is a collection of essays built on the thesis that “doxology” may serve as the best foundation for a theology of worship. Old constructs this theology of worship around the “themes and variations” of epicletic doxology, kerygmatic doxology, wisdom doxology, prophetic doxology, and covenantal doxology. As the title indicates, the intent is less to construct a systematic theology of worship than to explore and suggest a more holistic biblical theology or worship. From the outset, Old explains that while he is working within the Reformed tradition of worship, he does not follow some of the later, more rigid hermeneutical principles of some but rather prefers Oecolampadius’ approach which insists that worship should be “according to Scripture” but not limited to explicit commands. This approach is appreciative of the entire scope of Scripture and open to the broad swath of literary genres found there as well as a liturgical theology that can be developed from more typological readings of its entire corpus. Thus, Themes & Variations seeks to offer thoughts and observations following this thematic and typological exploration of Scripture while considering how the historic church — and particularly the Reformed church and her forebears — has understood these themes and sought to put these considerations into practice.

By epicletic doxology, Old means the basic function of worship as “calling upon God’s name.” As an embodiment of the first simple acclamation of the Lord’s Prayer, “hallowed be Thy name,” this basic affirmation is the positive result of heeding the first four commandments of the Decalogue but particularly the third commandment prohibiting the taking of the Lord’s name in vain. All sorts of epiclesis are found in Scripture and appropriate for God’s people to offer, prayers of praise and adoration as well as prayers for help and mercy. Old suggests that the Old Covenant tetragram of YHWH which was a revelation of God’s saving and delivering power and intent has been replaced in the New Covenant by ABBA, the name of God as Father, who is preeminently the Father of the Lord Jesus, but in Him the Father of all who call upon Him in faith. Old points out that many of the epicletic prayers and hymns of the Christian heritage are built upon strong typological correlations between events in redemptive history and the present circumstances of those in need (e.g. the negro spirituals’ use of Exodus imagery and themes).

Kerygmatic doxology is worship based upon proclamation. This proclamation is based upon the deeds and character of God. Old examines the prolific praise of God in the Psalter, particularly the acclamation of praise found in the “Hallelujahs.” This acclamation of praise to God as savior and king has obvious royal and political overtones, and this becomes explicit in the New Testament where Jesus is declared to be the Christ, the Messiah, who was to come to set all things right. All the psalmic acclamations of the Old Testament become centered in the coming of the Messiah and upon His rule as God’s only begotten Son, the great and final Solomon. The Christian canticles and hymns of the church from the earliest days clearly reflect this realization that the sovereign rule and reign of God has now been revealed in Jesus and therefore Christian worship has always had royal overtones and a sense of regal dignity. Preaching has always been considered to be part of this doxology as the preaching of the gospel has always been the proclamation of Jesus as the King who has brought salvation to the world.

Wisdom doxology seeks to understand worship as the outworking of the prominent themes of word, wisdom, and logos found woven through the story of Scripture. While this has been a rather neglected aspect of liturgical studies, Old suggests that the great resurgence in the study of wisdom theology presents a wealth of material for willing liturgists to begin to integrate into their “themes and variations.” Old points out that the Psalms do not shy away from wisdom themes and often consider the law of the Lord or the fear of the Lord, and the personification of Wisdom as a fine woman to be sought after (from Proverbs) found its way into at least a few allegorical interpretations of the Song of Solomon. All of this wisdom doxology culminates in its most explicit formulation in the prologue of John’s gospel where the logos/wisdom of God is identified with God and has become incarnate. This incarnate wisdom of God continues to work within the categories of marriage and love by immediately being presented as the bridegroom come to his bride in the miracle at Cana. It is the study of wisdom theology that connects this marriage and feast theme with the final consummation pictured in Revelation’s great wedding feast of the Lamb. Wisdom doxology affirms that the study of the Scriptures in faith is itself worship, and preaching, in this regard, has often particularly flowered as it studied the Scriptures for typological and allegorical revelations of the wisdom of God. While the reformers for the most part preferred a rather toned down or tamed version of Scriptural exegesis (i.e. redemptive-historical), the study, preaching, and even singing of Scripture itself has always been a turn to contemplating the word as the revelation of the Word. The Eucharist has also been seen as the revelation of the wisdom of God in so far as it is a foretaste of that wedding feast and the sacramental communication of the bread of life to God’s people.

Prophetic doxology is the insistence on the holiness of God and therefore the requirement for His worshippers themselves to be holy. The prophetic literature is replete with condemnations of hypocritical worship, rites and rituals that are empty because the lives of the people carrying them out do not coincide with what the words and actions proclaim. This does not imply that worshippers must themselves be sinless, but it requires that sinners approach God in need of forgiveness (witness Isaiah). Old makes the simple and yet profound point that righteousness has to do with right relationships. To be righteous or just is to act lawfully toward all of those in one’s life. Fidelity to a spouse, care and discipline of a child, submission to authority, and care for the poor would all fall into this understanding of righteousness. Of course a right relationship toward God is preeminent and must be diffused throughout all of the others. And thus a prophetic doxology insists that the morality proclaimed by word and action in worship must inform and be implemented throughout the worshipper’s life. Old argues that this is what is meant by “spiritual” worship. It is not an opposition of material to immaterial, as though “spiritual” was merely non-physical, rather what is meant by “spiritual worship” is a fundamental ethical quality in one’s service to God. It is an honest seeking of right relationships (i.e. righteousness/holiness) because of God’s holiness and for His glory. Here, Old examines Christian art in this prophetic context, distinguishing between the iconography of the medieval and “high church” traditions and the protestant religious and illustrative art. Given the second commandment, this contrast represents a prophetic element of protestant worship in so far as it seeks the ethical purity of worship. He closes by pointing out how fitting the “giving of alms” is in Christian worship. It is a tangible declaration of this righteous aim: it responds to the holiness of God rightly and makes provision for the maintenance of the Church and the care of the poor.

Finally, Old examines worship as a covenantal doxology. The Scriptures clearly present the relationship between God and humanity in covenantal terms and even more so, this is done in the context of worship. The covenant was always affirmed and renewed when God’s word was read or declared, and it was often sealed with sacrifices and a meal. The praise of God’s people is also highly covenantal as it recites the faithfulness of God to His promises. Declarations of faith, oaths, vows, and prayers all serve as the human side of the covenant renewal as well (see his discussion of the use of the word sacramentum). As God is declared to have been faithful to His people, His people in turn declare their willingness and intention to be faithful to Him. At the center of this covenantal doxology is the Eucharist of course. Fulfilling the sacrificial and festal realities of the Old Covenant, and given the promises of God that included a salvific destiny for the whole world, a covenantal doxology is necessarily an evangelistic doxology. A renewal of the covenant is a renewal of the Christian Church’s missional identity and calling. This is simply because the love of God always spills out into love of neighbor. Old closes this final exploration with consideration of some of the more recent architectural trends in the Christian Church. Recognizing that worship space is itself a kind of liturgical theology, Old celebrates some of the modern attempts in church architecture which recognize the centrality of the word and sacraments but also the centrality of the covenantal people of God who gather together before their covenantal head. It is simply a fact that the acoustics, layout, and arrangement of people, furniture, and other accoutrements display a covenant theology of worship (or betray a sorry ignorance of the same).

This brief treatise is an excellent introduction to an understanding of historic Reformed worship. While Old does not go into many details (e.g. concerning the precise wording of prayers, the order of the liturgy, etc.), what has been presented is a suggested beginning and methodology to constructing a biblically Reformed theology of worship. More important even than answering all of the sorts of modern questions we may have about worship, Old has illustrated a method of inquiry into the biblical text (and historic practice) and examined five themes which wind together to form a center from which one may continue to study and explore how the people of God ought to offer their doxology.

SS. Peter and Paul

June 29, 2007 — Leave a comment

This Sunday is the Fifth Sunday after Pentecost.

The Christian Almanac records that June 29 is remembered by the Church as the day the apostle Paul was beheaded with a sword in the city of Rome. Some place his execution as early as 62 A.D. and others as late as 67 A.D. Nevertheless, from the earliest times in the Church, this day has been celebrated as a feast day in honor of both Paul and Peter, who tradition also remembers as being executed in the city of Rome. For many centuries, boys born on June 29 were given the name Peter or Paul, and more often than not, both names! In many ways Peter and Paul are remembered and honored as symbolizing the foundational figures of the Christian Church after Christ. Peter is remembered for his great confession of faith declaring that Jesus was the Son of God. He is also honored as a prominent leader in the early Church in Jerusalem and later in Rome. Paul, an apostle born out of due time, as he describes himself, is honored as the greatest early missionary. His ministry to the gentiles of the first century laid the foundation for an early church that would grow and fill the entire Roman Empire. Paul’s pastoral efforts also gave us a significant portion of the New Testament found in the many letters he authored to the first Christians and which are still a major source of encouragment and instruction for the Christian Church today.

I would encourage you to remember these two giants of the faith, two saints and martyrs who followed Jesus their master with such faithfulness and courage. Hebrews 12 says that we are surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses, and it is a great comfort and encouragement that among that great cloud stand Peter and Paul, fathers and brothers in the faith, who now stand directly before God offering their prayers and praise. May God give us grace to follow in their steps, and may we honor them as mighty warriors of God.

The lessons for this Sunday will be Exodus 13:1-22, Galatians 3:23-4:7, and Luke 8:26-39.

Just Felicity

June 28, 2007 — Leave a comment

My son says that someday he will take a wife.

Not yet. When he is big.

He will need a job, he says. Because he will have to buy her lots of clothes.

He says that when he is big and takes a wife he will get in his car and drive away.

He says that while he is gone a bad man will come to his wife’s tent.

(I guess he spent all his money on clothes.)

Anyway, he says that his wife will give this bad man some milk to drink.

He says that after the bad man falls asleep his wife will come and hammer a big nail into his head and he will die.

Who Needs Phonics?

June 27, 2007 — 1 Comment

In The Love of Learning and Desire for God, Jean Leclercq describes the grammar studies in Benedictine monasteries: “During the Merovingian period, this teaching program was reduced practically to the psalms: and instead of beginning by the grammatical analysis of letters, then of syllables, words, and finally of sentences, the child is immediately put in contact with the psalter, in which he learns to read first verses, and then whole psalms.” Leclercq goes on to clarify that this was more by necessity (for students who were not literate) than by design, but it is still intriguing to consider a grammar school curriculum centered on the psalms. It’s been done before.

A Pure Bride

June 25, 2007 — Leave a comment

One of the things worth pointing out every so often is that the Bible’s sensibilities are not always what we might think of as holy or pious. For example, you will find the Bible using graphic sexual imagery to describe the immorality of Israel, or Paul says, concerning the Judaizers who were trying to get everyone circumcised, he wished they would cut the whole thing off. This means that while we must obey Scripture and not let any unclean thing come out of our mouth; we must not let Victorian prudishness substitute for Biblical standards.

Another example of this is found in one of the OT laws that required that when a man suspected his new bride to not be a virgin, her parents would be required to show proof of her virginity. They would show the blood of her virginity as a token of her purity and chastity. And if these tokens could not be produced, the new bride could be executed for her crime. One of the running themes in the story of the Exodus is Israel as the bride of Yahweh. God is coming to take Israel away to marry him, to enter into a covenant with Him at Sinai. But as we know from other places in Scripture Israel was not pure. Joshua tells Israel many years later to put away the idols they served in Egypt. Israel is not a virgin; she has not been pure or chaste. She has messed around with other gods. And this is one of the great glories of the Passover. When the Angel of Death comes God has every right in the world to strike down Israel along with all the other idol worshippers of Egypt. Israel is the unchaste bride, she has not been pure. But God in his great mercy and grace provides the blood; he provides the tokens of purity and chastity. He sees the blood on the doors, and he passes over. This meal is no different. This meal is not for people who have it all together. Who have never sinned, who have never failed, who have never seriously blown it. If you think you’re doing pretty good and haven’t really messed up, please leave now. This meal proclaims the Lord’s Death; it is a display of the blood of the true Passover. This blood, the blood of Jesus is our righteousness, our purity, our forgiveness. The blood of Jesus was shed for you and all your filth and all your sin and all the messes you’ve made. And God promises to see you in the blood and to call you his sons and daughters. This is the promise of the gospel to you; so come, eat, drink, rejoice, and believe.

Opening Prayer: Our Father, you Word is a great and powerful story. We do not know how it works, but you have determined to remake this world by the telling and retelling of this story. We thank you for Moses and Aaron, and we thank you for all of the faithful saints who killed lambs and smeared blood on their doors on that night some three and a half thousand years ago. We ask that you would teach us now by your Holy Spirit, that we would know you and your Christ and serve him more faithfully, through Jesus, Amen!

The Passover Is Kept
Moses commands that the elders “draw out” and “take” the sheep for their “clans” and for them to slaughter the Passover/Pesach (12:21). The instruction is to “touch” the blood to the lintel and doorposts of their houses. The word here is used in conjunction with several of the proto-Exodus accounts in Genesis: Yahweh touches Pharaoh for the sake of Sarai (Gen. 12:17), Abimelech is spared for not “touching” Sarah (Gen. 20:6), and he later forbids anyone to touch Isaac’s wife (Gen. 26:29). It is used a few other times, but only twice previously in Exodus where it occurs in the proleptic Passover in 4:25 and then as a foretelling of this final plague 11:1. This indicates that Israel is in this sense coming under this final plague, but rather than being “touched” by the plague, their houses are “touched” with the Passover blood. Notice that the safety of the blood is tied to the house/household. Anyone who goes out of the house is not protected by the blood (12:22-23). This law/ordinance is to be kept in all generations (12:24), and this Passover is to be their “service/labor.” Remember that Israel has been “laboring” for Pharaoh, but now Yahweh is enlisting their service. But instead of labor/service that is intended to shrink their population (remember Ex. 1-2), their “labor” is life-saving and preserving.

What Children Ask and Pharaoh Commands
God assumes first of all that their children will ask them about what they are doing (12:26). Children ask questions, often lots of questions. Those parents who despise these questions or refuse to spend time answering them are refusing to teach their children. But this also means that God delights in having odd things for children to ask about; in other words faithful parents should do things in order to be asked about them by their kids. The parents are instructed to rehearse the story of the original Passover and Exodus, how God struck Egypt and “delivered” the houses of Israel (12:27). The same word for delivered is used later to describe how Israel “spoiled/plundered” Egypt. Yahweh is the warrior who has fought and conquered Egypt, and He is taking Israel as his plunder. In the middle of the night, Yahweh comes and strikes throughout the land of Egypt, and it is so widespread that there is not a house which is not touched by the death (12:30). As we mentioned previously, there were probably some Egyptians who followed Moses’ instructions, but this verse indicates that there was still widespread disregard for the word of Yahweh. Notice that Pharaoh instructs Moses to do everything according to his “word” (12:31-32). His final request is that Moses would bless him which echoes what occurred between Jacob and the Pharaoh that Joseph served under (Gen. 47:7). This Pharaoh now acts like he knows Joseph (cf. 1:8).

Who Went and When
The text tells us that some six hundred thousand “feet of men” went out of Egypt (12:37). This description is probably a military designation, like “foot soldiers” (cf. Num. 11:21, Jdg. 20:2). A “mixed multitude” went up with them from Egypt which means that Egyptians went with them, and they ate the unleavened bread on their journey (12:38-39). They left Egypt after 430 years, to the very day (12:40). Remember Paul indicates that this period of time began with the covenant made with Abraham in Canaan (Gal. 3:17). It was on that very day that all the “armies of Yahweh” went out of Egypt (12:41, 51). This fits with the military designation of “foot soldiers” in 12:37. Finally, a last regulation is mentioned regarding the Passover meal: only covenant members are to eat it. This assumes first of all that this would be an issue, that is, there were foreigners, strangers, and other uncircumcised people in this “mixed multitude.” Yahweh says that there is to be one law for native-born and the stranger who dwells with Israel, if they want to eat the feast all the males of their household must be circumcised (12:44, 48). This final restriction on Passover is the basis for our practice of restricting participation in the Eucharist to those covenant members who have been baptized.

Conclusions and Applications
There is a huge emphasis on children throughout the entire Exodus narrative. It is the sons of Israel that Pharaoh attempts to exterminate, and it is the children of Israel that must go to the feast. Yahweh has done all of these wonders in order that his people may tell their children. And now Yahweh again gives instructions for passing on this story to their children. The Exodus story is the story of Yahweh fighting for the children. Israel must understand this. We do not live in a very different world. While we are not being directly persecuted by a tyrant (yet) we live in a culture that hates children. As Christians we are required to see the salvation that God has won for us as directly tied to our children. And it is not enough to *know* this; we must believe it deep in our bones. What we see here in this story is the command to tell stories to our children. Parents (and Fathers in particular) you are required to be reading and telling stories to your children regularly. They should be asking for stories, and you should be telling them. If you do not tell them the stories of God’s salvation and deliverance and goodness, the world will fill in the gaps. Tell stories. Tell the great stories, tell the funny stories, tell the glorious stories. Tell the gospel story. And if they are like any other child, they will want to hear the stories again and again. Faithful parents must be faithful story tellers. This is nothing more than imitation of our God, the God of our salvation.

In the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, Amen!

Closing Prayer: Good and merciful God, you have saved us and cleansed and delivered us from the kingdom of darkness into your marvelous light. We thank you and praise you for this, and we thank you that part of that salvation means the salvation of our children. But recognize that this is all by faith, and that we must trust you and obey you. Therefore give us this grace, the grace to remember and to tell the stories of your victories in history in our lives that our children may grow up to know and love you all their days. We know that this is all of grace, all your kindness, and therefore we give you thanks for what you have already given and what you will give.

The writer of Hebrews says that the church gathered together in worship constitutes Mt. Zion, the city of the Living God, a heavenly Jerusalem (Heb. 12:22). In Ephesians Paul says that we are citizens with the saints and members of the household of God (2:19). In other words, the Christian Church is a new city, a new kind of political and social reality. This means that among other things, the Christian Church is concerned with cultivating a distinctly Christian culture. This does not mean that we are supposed to retreat from anything and everything that non-Christians do or say or wear. God created the world full of all sorts of treasures: computers, cell phones, automobiles, clothing, television, music, and electricity, among many others. But as Christians one of the things that we confess is that sin has cursed our attempts to use these gifts wisely, and that only in Jesus Christ can we take dominion and rule as God intends. This means that Christians must take dominion by thinking through how they rule with these gifts and recognize that we cannot just copy whatever the god-haters around us are doing. There are many practical applications of this. Do you rule your television and movie consumption such that you are bringing edifying, true, and lovely stories into your home? Or is the television ruling you, constantly telling you lies about sex and beauty and happiness? Are you ruling the clothing you buy and wear, using it as a means to serve others? Or are you longing to look like the loose women in the magazines who despise the marriage bed which God says is holy? Is your computer a means for service to your family? Or do you spend hours staring into that blue screen, wasting your time in pointless chat rooms, or looking at pornography, all the while ignoring your children, brothers and sisters, and parents. Paul says in a slightly different context that whatever you do whether you eat or drink, do it all to the glory of God. The church is a new polis, a new city, a new family, and here at the center is the worship of the Triune God. This affects everything. You are not first and foremost an American. You are first and foremost a Christian. Therefore put away your idols; put away your sin. We are ascending into the heavenly places now. So come, worship the Lord.

This Sunday is the Fourth Sunday after Pentecost.

The Christian Almanac records that on June 22, 431 A.D. the Third Ecumenical Council began in the city of Ephesus, on the west coast of modern day Turkey. This council was called to deal with yet another controversy related to the nature of Christ. One of the central debated points was whether or not Mary, the mother of Jesus, might be rightly called “Theotokos,” that is, the “God-bearer.” The term was not meant to imply that the second person of the Trinity originated with Mary, but rather, it asserted that Mary truly bore in her womb God in the flesh. It insisted that from the moment of conception, the person of Jesus was both fully God and fully man. Nestorius and his followers taught, on the other hand, that the person of Jesus was merely human until a certain point when God came to dwell within him in a unique way. Cyril of Alexandria, following in the footsteps of Athanasius the Great, contended for the orthodox faith by insisting that the person who was born of Mary, lived a perfect life, died on a Roman cross, and rose again on the third day was really and truly God in the flesh, the second person of the Trinity incarnate. Jesus was not merely an inspired or God-filled man; he was God as a man. He was Emmanual, God with us.

We often look back on these controversies and wonder why they matter that much. We get confused with all the foreign sounding names and dates and places. But we must recognize that these great events mark God’s faithfulness to His people, the Church, preserving for us the gospel of grace. If Jesus the man was anything less than God himself, then how can we be sure that God is really for us? How can we know that we have really been reconciled to God? Thanks be to God for faithful men like Cyril of Alexandria who clung to the Scriptures and refused to compromise with those who preferred reason and logic and philosophy to what the Word of God clearly taught. May God give us the faith to do the same.

Our lessons for this Sunday will be from Ex. 12:21-51, Gal. 2:15-21, 3:10-14, and Lk. 7:36-50.

What He Said

June 19, 2007 — 3 Comments

I’m putting some toys away with my son when he looks up with his eyebrows signalling concern.

“Dad?”
“Yes?”
“Sometimes I eat baby soap.”
“Oh. Does it taste good?”
“Yeah. I really like it.”
“Huh. Ok.”