Archives For May 2012

My friend Joffre on Pentecostal Partying:

Pentecost Sunday is past. We are now in Ordinary Time. You have been given the Holy Spirit. The Kingdom is come in you. The Kingdom makes demands, it pricks in the heart. Live a life that demands the question, what meaneth this?

And if I may suggest it, perhaps you’d like to do that with the emphasis that I’ve chosen for my own good-spell telling: unapologetic feasting. Listen, these are not drunken as you suppose; they are filled with joy, and the Holy Ghost.

If you are single-mindedly obsessed with saving the world, you will look ridiculous. If you act as if God is your joy and comfort, as if all your needs will be met by him, you will look ridiculous.

Live the sort of profligately joyful life that the world could only call foolhardy. As if the resources of all of Creation were yours. Because they are; your Father has promised them to you. Suffer and rejoice. Feast in your poverty. Give alms; care for widows; you will always have enough. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world. Continue Reading…

Fear and Comfort

May 28, 2012 — Leave a comment

In Acts 9 just after the conversion of Paul, Luke says that the churches throughout all of Judea, Galilee, and Samaria had peace and were edified, “And walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit, they were multiplied” (Acts 9:31). First, it’s worth pointing out that the “fear of the Lord” and the “comfort of the Holy Spirit” go together, they’re friends. Second, when they’re together, the Lord multiplies the churches. Which means that what we all need around here is a little more of the right kind of fear and the right kind of comfort.

Towards the end of the last millennium, Peter Leithart writes:

One of the lesser-known works of John Calvin is a tract whose short title is “An Inventory of Relics.” It is predominantly a sharp attack on the extremes of medieval Catholic piety-practices that I imagine many Catholics would today dismiss as empty superstitions. Samples of Christ’s hair, teeth, even his foreskin were distributed across Europe, and so much of Jesus’ blood had been preserved as to “be diffused over the whole world.” Calvin complained that “had the most Holy Virgin yielded a more copious supply [of milk] than is given by a cow, or had she continued to nurse during her whole lifetime, she scarcely could have furnished the quantity which is exhibited.” The complaint could have been written by Voltaire.

Calvin’s attack on relic veneration, however, was grounded in an evangelical insight that lies at the heart of the Reformation. “The first abuse,” Calvin wrote, “and, as it were, the beginning of the evil, was that when Christ ought to have been sought in his Word, sacraments, and spiritual influences, the world, after its wont, clung to his garments, vests, and swaddling clothes; and thus overlooking the principal matter, followed only its accessory.” In his Institutes of the Christian Religion, Calvin offered a similar critique of the liturgical tradition of the medieval Church. Formally, Calvin’s argument is that many medieval ceremonies were human inventions, unwarranted by Scripture. It would be a mistake, however, to reduce his argument to a trivial quarrel over the warrant for this vestment or that gesture. Calvin’s principal concern was evangelical and pastoral; he wished to direct sinners to that “place” where they could encounter the living God. Ceremonies, he argued, “to be exercises of piety, ought to lead us straight to Christ.” Ceremonies and devotional practices that fail this test are best removed from the Church. Continue Reading…

When Sennacherib has taunted the people of God in Jerusalem and proclaimed that their doom is sure, God gives Hezekiah a sign of their safety and deliverance. That sign is a continuing harvest. God says that they will eat the harvest this year and next year and the third year. God tells them to plant their vineyards, and eat the fruit. The food means they will be safe.

God prepares this table for you in the presence of your enemies. And this table is God’s sign and promise to you that no weapon formed against you shall prosper. Here you are assured that you are safe beneath the shadow of His wings. Continue Reading…

In Isaiah 56, the Lord says that foreigners and eunuchs who keep Sabbath and hold fast God’s covenant will be given a place in the Lord’s house and a name better than sons and daughters, an everlasting name that shall not be cut off. He says that He will bring them to His holy mountain and make them joyful in His house of prayer. In the Old Covenant, the house of God was fiercely guarded. The ugliness of sin was underlined by the fact that anyone with a defect, blindness, physical marring, missing limbs, hunchback, or eunuchs were prohibited from going near the presence of God. But baptism is the sign of the New Covenant that Isaiah foretold. It is the gracious promise of God to all nations, all people, all outcasts, all the broken, blind, lame, eunuchs, that by the blood of Christ and His life-giving Holy Spirit all may enter the house of God.

We might wonder: exactly what has changed? Sin is still sin; God is still holy; and all those defects are still real. There are still people in this world born broken. There are still barren women, blind men, disease ridden bodies. Why is it that they can now draw near? The Ascension of Jesus means that we all have a man in glory. We have an older brother at the right of the Father who is completely whole, who has no defect, whom death could not hold, who ever intercedes for us. He is our ticket, our passport, our guarantee of entrance. But God doesn’t leave us untouched. Isaiah says that eunuchs will be welcomed into God’s house and given a name better than sons and daughters, an everlasting name that shall never be cut off, and He will make them joyful in His house of prayer. This is only possible if people really can be born again. This is only possible if the Holy Spirit regenerates and heals the fundamental problem of sin and guilt and death in us, in our bodies. Continue Reading…

All sin is ultimately rooted in pride, and this is because despite the fact that people are victimized by sin (and by their own sin), the fact remains that people choose to sin. You choose to snap at your wife. You choose to discipline your children in anger. You choose to complain about your home or your family. You choose to be bitter. You choose to ignore the neighbor in need. You choose not to give generously. You choose to have another beer, you choose to look at that porn, you choose to flirt with your coworker. That choice is rebellion. That choice is treachery. That choice is pride. It says I know better, I can see all things, I have accounted for all the details, and this is right. This is true. This is what I need; this is what I deserve. But this is to pretend to be God. This is arrogance and absolute folly. Continue Reading…

Kaleb & Jessie

May 20, 2012 — 1 Comment

Kaleb and Jesse, you are about to embark on a great adventure together, and there are significant ways in which your lives are changing in this ceremony. You enter this building in one fashion: single, unbound to one another, and by the exchange of vows before this congregation, you each become something new, something different, something that you were not before. Because God’s Word is powerful and efficacious, He has shared that magic with us. While all words mimic this power of God in some ways, some make this more obvious than others. In baptism, God places His name on us, and whatever happens after an individual is baptized, His name is indelibly pressed upon them forever, even if they rebel and reject that grace. In baptism, God authorizes us to name individuals with His name, but this is how naming works all over the place. Just as God named parts of His creation, so too, Adam named the animals, and whatever He called them, those were their names. Our words are powerful and efficacious. Parents have a new baby and name the child, and that child now has that name. We really ought to be a bit more amazed with this magic, especially with some names going around. How did you get that name? Magic. Today in a similar fashion, Jessie, you are taking Kaleb’s name.

But while we rightly point to the dramatic change that is about to occur in the course of this service, I want to point to something that will not be changing. I’ve made it a point over the last year or so to begin the first session of all my pre-marital counseling with a request that the couple take turns and tell me their testimony. How did they come to know Jesus? How is it that Christ is their God and Savior? Continue Reading…

Along with the birth, death, and resurrection of Jesus, the most ancient confessions of faith have always also insisted that the ascension of Jesus into heaven, to be seated at the right hand of the Father is essential to the gospel, essential to the good news we declare. But in order for us to be able to declare it as good news, it must be for us good news.

Whenever a people as a whole are reluctant to share the gospel, embarrassed to proclaim the gospel to the world, we must ask whether it isn’t because we’ve gotten bored with the news. Or sometimes it’s just because we didn’t know how good it was.

There are a number of ways we could run with this, but I want to focus on just one. And that is that the ascension of Jesus is good news because it frees us from the tyranny of looking for our god here. This world is full of slavery and lies, and the fundamental source of all slavery and lies is the grasping for security and safety and salvation somewhere, somehow, here and now. Stuff, money, sex, prestige, beauty, health, power, and there are even idols in our good deeds: salvation through rigorous prayer times, long Bible readings, perfect liturgies, family devotions, parish groups, morning prayer, mercy ministry, reading theology books, going to conferences, or sending your kids to classical Christian schools or homeschooling. All good and fine things, gifts of God to be cherished and enjoyed in their place: but if we find our security, our comfort, our joy in them rather than seeing them as the gifts of Jesus to us and for us, then we are substituting something for Jesus. You’re making something else your god, something else your savior. But if Jesus ascended into heaven, then this is good news because it frees us from the tyranny of looking for our god here. It frees us to enjoy life, to receive the gifts of God, to share the abundance of God freely, gladly, because our God is not here. Continue Reading…

Wild Truth

May 16, 2012 — Leave a comment

Another follow up thought on the Douthat post below: This American “openness to heresy” seems to me to be a peculiarly Protestant stance, particularly, a sort of political/social manifestation of Sola Scriptura. Protestantism rejects human authority as supreme (whether in prelacy or tradition), and insists that Jesus is the head of the Church, ruling through His Spirit and Word in this world (though respecting tradition and human authority subordinated to the Word). In other words, despite the schismatic sins and fleshly rivalries wound through it, Protestantism has always, in principle, had this “openness to heresy” at least as much because of its confidence and delight in the freedom of the Spirit. As Douthat notes, it’s the heretics, the heterodox who are always trying to tidy up the faith, trying to make the Spirit tuck His shirt in and wipe the jelly smudges off His cheeks. But there is something of a symbiotic relationship between heresy and orthodoxy, such that heretics press in on the faithful in an ultimately sharpening, glorifying way, causing the Church to burn brighter with the truth, slowly, relentlessly leaving lies and distortions behind. Just as God is able to destroy death by death, just as sin and evil are able to be deftly wielded by the omnipotent competence of the author of this story we are in, so too, lies, misunderstanding, and false teachers are bent to the good purposes of the Spirit. And all this without striking a truce with any evil.   Continue Reading…

Chestertonian America?

May 15, 2012 — 1 Comment

I just starting listening to Ross Douthat’s new book Bad Religion. He makes the fascinating suggestion towards the beginning that while most other western nations had official, established religions, America was founded on a certain openness to falsehood intentionally. But disestablishment was/is not necessarily in itself a capitulation to sects or secularism, though it certainly seems to have tended that way down to the present. What Douthat points out is that perhaps more than anything it reveals a certain confidence in the truth and the irresistible adventure of orthodoxy — in the grand Chestertonian sense. Perhaps it was not agnosticism or deism or some other vague pluralism that drove the founding fathers to design a nation in principle open to heresy. Perhaps it was the adventurous spirit of the orthodox faith itself and a certainty about the timid blandness of all pretenders which created a glad openness to the future simultaneously gripped by a confidence in the “faith once delivered to the saints.”